Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frantic Pedantic's avatar

That Ian Bogost piece in The Atlantic is mind-boggling. Here is a man who has so little imagination that he cannot *conceive* of what people did with their idle time before smart phones. It's telling that his limited examples include "pace, sulk, or stew" and never, for example, *talking* to the people around him, or reading a newspaper on the subway, or just letting yourself be bored for ten g-d- minutes. He says "I cannot overemphasize how little there was to do before we all had smartphones." And this is supposed to be a bad thing?

I've been reading the extensive research Jonathan Haidt has been offering on his Substack, and it is sobering: smart phones have played a disastrous role in affecting our mental health, attention spans, social cohesion, political comity and more. These are the effects of things smart phones enable us to "do" all the time, in lieu of boredom. That Bogost would subject us to all of that simply so that *he* doesn't have to ever be bored... what a horrible, tragically circumscribed worldview. To paraphrase Dr. Zoidberg, "His opinion is bad and he should feel bad."

Expand full comment
Vinny's avatar

Scythe sounds dope as hell.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts